Why is there not more info on bush cows online than there is?

"On arrival in the Mali Empire he settled in a village in the middle of a drought. The villagers’ only source of water was a river taken over by a wild bush cow. The bush cow, believed to be an evil spirit, killed anyone who ventured to the river to draw water. Tohadzie led the villagers to kill the wild beast making the river accessible" The proceeding was probably the longest nonfictional online reference to what has been hyped as one of the most disturbingly deadly of all bovines. There's a short fictional account of a dual b/n a bush cow & an elephant. There's a brief description of it as an African short horned buffalo. I read in a book about a decade ago about dangerous animals that refer ed to the bc stalking people who spooked it, hunting them down & killing them as long as several hours after the disturbance that provoked it. I thought of that book, & tried to look up "bush cow" online. There wasn't articles about bc's. like there is on animals that are at least as obscure, & far less notorious. Maybe it's related to an obama bull.lol. I ume somebody would play a card like that, so I played it 1st. The descriptions I've read should give the bush cow quite a bit of notoriety. If it is that disturbing & brazen, why isn't it more hyped? If not, why isn't there more online refuting it? It's refered to (in ping) online enough to make its notoriety obvious. But why is there not even a Wikipedia article dedicated to a bovine thus hyped? The Net is far more customized than books or encyclopedias. So, for all I know, that book may have been the most descriptive article ever written on it.